All Articles

Where does "fun" come from at work? This article discusses values, permission to dissent, agency, and nerdy passion, relating these to the literature on psychological safety. It argues that you can't really engineer trust, culture, or happiness directly in the workplace, or perhaps in life in general.

This article explores the alignment gap between employees and equity owners through dot-com era anecdotes. True ownership demands financial or personal sacrifice—shares gifted for free lack real stakes. Intangible goodwill and networked effects constitute significant long-term value often invisible to non-shareholders. While many workers prefer paycheck safety over ownership risks, bridging this divide remains a fundamental workplace challenge.

Pay is another aspect of the Alignment Gap between employees and owners. This article discusses the employer mindset in compensation, the role of intangibles, the problem with remote work, and the value of the unselfish edge in improving your take-home value. Ultimately, the text encourages a holistic view of employment where shared success is prioritised over rigid extraction.

While truth is a fundamental tool for personal growth and organizational trust, sharing too much information can cause unnecessary stress or panic. Leaders must often withhold details to maintain confidentiality or stability. This is the transparency paradox.

The Alignment Gap between employees and owners causes friction. Workers frequently perceive leadership decisions as hostile or opaque because of an asymmetry of risk, where owners carry the burden of survival and financial liability, and workers carry the burden of execution. To overcome this disconnect, you can adopt an owner mindset, assuming responsibility for problems that have no home, finding greater personal purpose and influence within your career.

Our "battle-hardened" perspectives provide indispensable value, though we ourselves may be blind to that perspective. Fear of unoriginality, redundancy, and imposter syndrome silence our unique voices. Adopting a personal "constitution" of self love, and defining a good purpose liberates us to life.

AI lacks subjective taste, relying on data patterns rather than human intuition or emotion. While AI enhances productivity, true creativity requires an author’s unique vibe and lived experience. Humans provide the authenticity and spirit that machines cannot replicate.

Human taste serves as a vital differentiator in commercial processes as AI automates output. Productivity belongs to robots, leaving humans to focus on the "wasteful" play and experimentation arising from our curiosity. Ultimately, humans will use AI as an amplifier, encoding their "golden intent" more and more to project themselves further into the world.

What is at the root of the things we value? Using the "5 Whys" technique and by relating our lives to other things we think are valuable (gold, real estate, art, stocks, crypto, etc), we begin to see that value often lacks objective foundations. Instead, it is a subjective construct manufactured through marketing, cultural conditioning, and perceived scarcity. Ultimately, value depends on shared human beliefs and tribal psychology, serving as a proxy for meaning in an otherwise abstract and uncertain world.